Can We Justify Infidelity ?

This may be a somewhat primitive question to
ask but it’s been asked again and again both by those who
commit infidelity and those who are victims of it.
It's an interesting question as some scientists
do question whether human beings are firstly meant to be
monogamous. Biologically, males and females search for the best
mate at the time of fertility. For a male that's to find a
female ready to mate and for females it is when they are
biologically ready and they find a suitable mate who is deemed
strong and capable of protecting them and their offspring.
This is still the case in the animal kingdom
but as humans we've evolved to a point we're no longer bound to
biological imperatives and are more governed by our brains.
Nevertheless, this doesn't mean we've got away from our primal
urges. It just means we keep them in check and society
has evolved rules and regulations of what is acceptable
culturally.
We can notice that among cultures itself there
are differences in what they perceive as acceptable. For
a long time, it was acceptable for males to indulge in
infidelity but for females they were punished severely.
In fact today, even in western societies, it is still frowned
on for females to indulge in infidelity. This is a
natural reaction as female infidelity can often result in
unfairness to children who are deprived of their rights of a
normal family.
Take an interesting case of a woman who had sex
with both the husband and the twin of the husband with 24
hours. The result is a long battle of who will pay the
child support as neither wish to do so as paternity tests are
not able to determine which of them is the father. As
outsiders, we can only feel sorry for the child who has to face
a situation that she has no part off and she definitely does
not deserve.
In some cultures, like the Muslim world, they
have tried to come to their solution of fairness to the
children in forbidding all sex outside marriage. But to
prevent men from committing adultery, they have allowed men to
be polygamous. They view this as a solution for
protection of children and also the first wife who would not
need to be divorced and alone as often the case in the western
world.
To most of us, we would view this as being
terribly unfair to women but they have explained that it is a
realistic answer to a situation where the biological functions
of both men and women are not the same and will never be.
Women will always be mothers and in many ways, the prime
caregiver to their children.
With the liberalization of women’s rights and
the gradual acceptance of infidelity in women as in men, the
immediate effects are increased divorces and breakdowns in
marriages. As I see it, children are the ones who have to
pay the price. Of course, men are punished in that they
have to pay support and continue other responsibilities but at
the end of the day, it is the children who are the victims.
In the final conclusion, infidelity which is
basically a breach of contract will incur a price to be paid,
whether it is by the other spouse or the person himself or
herself. But it is the children who almost always have a
price to pay.
It is for this reason that society should not
deemphasize the gravity of a commitment or marriage.
People should be reminded not to enter marriage without
seriously considering their commitments. The issue of
infidelity on the other hand, should not be looked upon as
standing alone but totally part and parcel of a whole
package.
Click here to add this page to your favorites
|